Islam Rediscovered

A Personal God versus an impersonal God

Islam Rediscovered — Maulana Wahiduddin Khan

Badges mark quoted or attributed material (Qur'an, hadith, another author, an opposing view). Unbadged passages are Maulana Wahiduddin Khan's own words.

Contents (113 chapters)
  1. Preface
  2. Search for Truth
  3. Philosophy
  4. Science
  5. Mysticism
  6. Faith and Reason
  7. Natural Argument
  8. Philosophical Argument
  9. Spiritual Argument
  10. Scientific Argument
  11. The Concept of God
  12. One God versus many gods
  13. A Personal God versus an impersonal God
  14. Religion
  15. Religions Other than Islam
  16. Islam in Brief
  17. True Guidance
  18. A. Individual
  19. B. Society
  20. C. State
  21. The Creation Plan of God
  22. Discovery of Islam
  23. Why Islam Alone
  24. Prophetic Perspective
  25. Separation of Spirit and Form
  26. Communalization of the Religion
  27. The Veil of Interpretation
  28. The Obsession with Historical Glory
  29. The Man Islam Builds
  30. Internal Development
  31. External Activities
  32. Intellectual Development
  33. (Razin)
  34. The Islamic Way of Life
  35. Iman (faith)
  36. Ibadah (worship)
  37. Akhlaq (morality)
  38. The Quran portrays Muslims as individuals who “repel evil with good.” (28:54)
  39. “One who is not grateful to man cannot be grateful to God either.” (Al-Bayhaqi)
  40. Social Relations
  41. A. Individual Responsibility
  42. B. Family Life
  43. C. Legitimate Livelihood
  44. Islam As It Is
  45. Non-Violence and Islam
  46. Peaceful Beginning
  47. Success Throgh the Non-violent Method
  48. Political Revolt Unlawful
  49. The Command of War in Islam
  50. The Modern Age and Non-Violence
  51. The Manifestation of Religion
  52. A Great Opportunity
  53. Islam in the Present Age
  54. Dawah Activism
  55. Through dawah even the direst of enemy turns into a dearest friend. (41:34)
  56. Muslims Displaced
  57. Peace and Justice
  58. Conclusion
  59. Islamic Fundamentalism
  60. On Islam and Jihad
  61. Ideological Hatred
  62. Terrorism in the Name of Islam
  63. Fundamental Principles of Islam
  64. Islam and Politics
  65. The Challenge of Fundamentalism
  66. The Shariah and Its Application
  67. Lead all men to the path of your Lord with wisdom and mild exhortation. (16:25)
  68. Bear up then with patience, as did the steadfast Apostles before you. (46:35)
  69. Fight for the sake of God those that fight against you. (2:190)
  70. The Secret of Guidance and Ignorance
  71. Spirituality in Islam
  72. The Universe—a Source of Divine Inspiration
  73. A Personal Experience
  74. “God plants wisdom in the heart of one who shows disinclination for the world.”
  75. Preservation, Updating, Dawah
  76. (c) Process of dawah
  77. Contribution of Muhaddithin (Scholars of Hadith)
  78. Religious Institutions
  79. Updating
  80. Updating: Reapplication of Shariah
  81. Dawah
  82. Islam Stands the Test of History
  83. Prophetic Vision
  84. Envisioning the Future
  85. Seeing an Advantage Amidst Disadvantages
  86. Introducing Peace as the Most Powerful Weapon
  87. His Words Determine the Course of History
  88. Islamic Activism
  89. 1. Positive Status Quoism in Religious Affairs
  90. Unlimited Scope of Patience
  91. The Islamic Concept of History
  92. Creation Plan of God
  93. The Age of Perversion
  94. The Reasons for Perversion
  95. The Problem of Evil
  96. The Revolutionary Role of Islam
  97. Historical Revolution
  98. (This kind of persecution has been mentioned in the Quran as ‘fitna’). (8:39)
  99. Freedom of Choice
  100. The End of the Superstitious Era
  101. Truth Unveiled
  102. Islam in History
  103. The Eradication of Fitna
  104. The Age of Religious Freedom
  105. The Peaceful Propagation of Islam
  106. The Role of Non-Muslims in Islamic Development
  107. Conversion: An Intellectual Transformation
  108. Islam and Conversion
  109. Conversion—A universal principle
  110. The reality of Conversion
  111. Conversion—A healthy historical process
  112. A Case of Discovery
  113. Conclusion

A Personal God versus an impersonal God

There are again several kinds of beliefs about God. Some believe in two gods, one of good and the other of evil. Some believe in three, as in the form of the trinity, a construct of the Christians. There are others who believe in multitudes of gods, as in Hinduism.

Now, of these concepts which should be held right and which wrong? The Quran gives us a clear assertion on this subject: There are only two forms of credible knowledge, that is, revealed knowledge and scientific knowledge. (46:4)

Let us first take revealed knowledge. When we make a survey of revealed scriptures, the first question that arises is which one of them is to be regarded as authentic? Apparently, in the world of today, there are many religious books which are said by their adherents to enshrine God’s revelations. But when these books are judged on the basis of history, we find that none of them can sustain their credibility on purely historical grounds. We have no way of knowing, as a matter of historical record, precisely when and how these books came into existence, what their original language was, how they were preserved after the First Giver, how they reached later generations of followers—all these questions remain unanswered. These books are thus believed by their adherents to be holy scriptures, without their having any historical proof of this.

In this non-historical museum of “revealed” scriptures, the Quran is the only divine book which comes up to the standard of history in every respect. The Quran has every kind of historical credibility and authenticity, so that one may believe in it with full confidence.

This means that if an individual wants to find out the concept of God according to revealed knowledge, he can trust only the Quran to be the authentic source. It is a fact that, the Quran is the only existing divine scripture which provides a reliable source of learning the true concept of God.

When we refer to the Quran on this subject, we find that, according to revealed knowledge, there is only one true concept of God, and that is pure monotheism. That is, God is only one. He has no partner, no equal. He is eternal and beyond time and space. He alone is the Creator and Sustainer of all things. (2:255)

So far as the concept of three gods, or the trinity, is concerned, it is highly illogical in every respect. It is not proved by any revealed source. Even today it is merely a creed of the Christian Church. In neither the Old Testament, nor the New Testament, held sacred by Christians, is there any clear mention of the concept of the trinity. In their own sacred scriptures, the trinity is an alien creed.

So far as reason then is concerned, the concept of the trinity is not rationally understandable. In terms of the trinity, God is at the same time three in one and one in three. This is an inconceivable mathematical riddle, which none of the greatest of mathematicians can solve. That is why when a Christian professor at an Indian university was once asked by a student to explain the trinity, he had this to say:

If you ask me, I do not know, if you do not ask me, I know.

The truth is that the concept of the trinity is wholly unproved so far religious scriptures are concerned. It is likewise entirely baseless judging by the criteria of knowledge and reason. Keeping this reality in view, it will not be wrong to say that this concept is so unfounded that, prima facie, it stands rejected.

Now let us talk of scientific knowledge. Scientific knowledge provides an academic verification of this concept of the one God. It affirms that God cannot be more than one, the concept of many gods not being understandable to a scientist.

The world discovered by science is a wholly unified world. All the parts of the present world are so interlinked with each other that it is impossible to separate them from one another. In such a world the concept of more than one God is quite alien. For instance, if the sun, the air, water, human beings and the earth had not been governed by one and the same Creator, a world of the present kind would never have come into existence. For instance, if the sunshine reached the earth unhampered, without there being the atmosphere to neutralize its harmful rays, the sun would be a killer instead of a source of life. If the gases in water were not in their present proportions, no living organisms could ever have come into being on the earth. If the size of the earth were half or double the present size, in either case civilization on earth would have been well-nigh impossible.

There are countless things in the world. But everything exists in such proportions as will give the maximum benefit to life on earth. None of the things on this earth are out of proportion. This shows that there is only one God—the Creator and Sustainer of this world. If there were different gods for different things, then, this perfect balance could never have been possible. In ancient times people believed that there were numerous forces controlling the universe. Newton reduced these forces to the following four:

gravitational force, electromagnetic force, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force.

However, the extraordinary unity that scientists found in the world was incompatible with the notion that it was being controlled by four forces.

That is why the scientists have been trying to reduce the four forces to one. Their efforts were crowned with success in the second half of the twentieth century. It is now generally believed that there cannot be four forces controlling nature, but only one. This has led to the formulation of the Single String Theory by scientists.

This goes to prove that the concept called tawheed (oneness of God) in revealed knowledge is fully borne out by scientific knowledge as well—that there is only one God, not many gods controlling this world.